Politics

The Supreme Court told the Pegasus case seriously: Asked the petitioners to hand over the copy of their petition to the Center

The top court was hearing nine petitions seeking a probe into the Pegasus espionage case

The Supreme Court on Thursday said that the media report about Pegasus spying is a serious matter, if true. The top court has asked the petitioners to give copies of their petitions to the central government.

The top court questioned the petitioners that there was no attempt by the persons affected by espionage to file a criminal complaint with the police before approaching this court.

A bench of Chief Justice NV Ramanna and Justice Surya Kant asked the petitioners to give copies of the petitions to the central government and posted the matter for further hearing on Tuesday. However, the Supreme Court has not yet issued a formal notice to the central government in this matter.

During the hearing, the Chief Justice said, “If the reports in the media are true, then the allegations are of serious nature. I also do not want to say that there is nothing in the arguments. We are also not saying that some of the petitioners have not been affected by this. Some claim that their phones have been hacked.

But the question is why did they not try to file a criminal complaint. The top court was hearing nine petitions seeking a probe into the Pegasus espionage case.

Also, read| Twitter Listens More to America, in 99 Percent of Cases it Did Not Listen to India

  • Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for petitioner senior journalist N Ram, termed Pegasus as a “rogue technology” and said it was a technique to subvert the national interest. Through this, our lives have been infiltrated without our knowledge. The phone entered our lives. It is an attack on privacy, human dignity, and our republic.
  • The Chief Justice also questioned all the petitioners that this issue had come up in 2019 but why was no serious concern raised then?
  • The Chief Justice also said, “The people to whom the write petitions have been filed are more knowledgeable and resourceful.
  • They should have worked harder to gather more material in this matter.
  • In this case, apart from Sibal, senior advocate Shyam Dewan Arvind Attar Rakesh Dwivedi Shiv Singh Meenakshi Arora appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
  • However, during the hearing on Thursday, no law officer on behalf of the central government was present in the court.

For daily news updates related to finance, business and sports keep following our portal Daily News Capsule

Recent Posts

Chappell Roan’s Comments on Intrusive Fans Reveal the Complexity of Celebrity Relationships

Starting over a decade ago with YouTube covers under her real name, she began her… Read More

1 month ago

April fool’s day 2021|Hisotry|Significance|Images|Quotes

April fools day 2024: this day is celebrated every year on 1st April, by throwing… Read More

1 month ago

2008 Ahmedabad Bomb Blast: Justice After 14 Years, 38 Convicts Sentenced to Death

Ahmedabad Bomb Blast: The perpetrators of the 2008 Ahmedabad bombings were sentenced to 13 years… Read More

3 years ago

Singer-Composer Bappi Lahiri Passed Away at the Age of 69

The death of 69-year-old singer and composer Bappi Lahiri comes as a shock to the… Read More

3 years ago

Delhi Rain Breaks 121-Year-Old Record in January

Due to record-breaking rain and heavy snowfall, entire north India, including Delhi, has been blanketed… Read More

3 years ago

What is Fast Spreading Stealth Omicron? Why it is Dangerous?

The coronavirus pandemic has made life difficult for everyone on the planet. Its numerous and… Read More

3 years ago